Nurses¿ Professional Judgement of Emergency Cases. A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial to Enhance the Unterstanding of Decision-Making
- Indbinding:
- Paperback
- Sideantal:
- 80
- Udgivet:
- 5. februar 2024
- Udgave:
- 24001
- Størrelse:
- 148x6x210 mm.
- Vægt:
- 129 g.
- 2-15 hverdage.
- 7. december 2024
På lager
Normalpris
Abonnementspris
- Rabat på køb af fysiske bøger
- 1 valgfrit digitalt ugeblad
- 20 timers lytning og læsning
- Adgang til 70.000+ titler
- Ingen binding
Abonnementet koster 75 kr./md.
Ingen binding og kan opsiges når som helst.
- 1 valgfrit digitalt ugeblad
- 20 timers lytning og læsning
- Adgang til 70.000+ titler
- Ingen binding
Abonnementet koster 75 kr./md.
Ingen binding og kan opsiges når som helst.
Beskrivelse af Nurses¿ Professional Judgement of Emergency Cases. A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial to Enhance the Unterstanding of Decision-Making
Master's Thesis from the year 2023 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: A, University of Malta (Ecnonomics, Management, Accountancy), course: Management, language: English, abstract: This study serves as a pilot project utilizing simulation-based research tools to enhance understanding of decision-making processes and judgments in critical, clinical contexts. The aim is to conduct a 'noise audit' simulation to capture decision outcomes and analyze variances resulting from judgmental errors, particularly from a 'non-practitioner' standpoint. A blinded, randomized controlled trial employing Simulation-Based Research (SBR) methods was conducted with control and experimental groups. Participants used a custom web-application to self-report mood, score triage judgments on fictitious emergency cases, provide justifications, and share personality traits. Sessions were held at hospital administration buildings and university campuses, with no interaction with academic personnel on setup.
The study explores the concept of smoke detectors in managerial decision-making, recognizing errors and judgments as inherent to decision processes faced by organizational leaders and decision-makers. Bias and noise, identified as contributors to errors, are examined, with bias referring to systematic distortion and noise to variability or randomness in decision information. Empirical studies have demonstrated their impact, particularly in medical decision-making. Strategies such as bias recognition training and noise reduction through multiple information sources can mitigate human error. The study aims to deepen understanding of decision-making in critical contexts through simulation-based research tools.
The study explores the concept of smoke detectors in managerial decision-making, recognizing errors and judgments as inherent to decision processes faced by organizational leaders and decision-makers. Bias and noise, identified as contributors to errors, are examined, with bias referring to systematic distortion and noise to variability or randomness in decision information. Empirical studies have demonstrated their impact, particularly in medical decision-making. Strategies such as bias recognition training and noise reduction through multiple information sources can mitigate human error. The study aims to deepen understanding of decision-making in critical contexts through simulation-based research tools.
Brugerbedømmelser af Nurses¿ Professional Judgement of Emergency Cases. A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial to Enhance the Unterstanding of Decision-Making
Giv din bedømmelse
For at bedømme denne bog, skal du være logget ind.Andre købte også..
Find lignende bøger
Bogen Nurses¿ Professional Judgement of Emergency Cases. A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial to Enhance the Unterstanding of Decision-Making findes i følgende kategorier:
© 2024 Pling BØGER Registered company number: DK43351621