How Can Dod Compare Damage Costs Against Resilience Investment Costs for Climate-Driven Natural Hazards?
- Indbinding:
- Paperback
- Sideantal:
- 94
- Udgivet:
- 15. juni 2023
- Størrelse:
- 216x5x279 mm.
- Vægt:
- 245 g.
- 2-3 uger.
- 17. december 2024
På lager
Forlænget returret til d. 31. januar 2025
Normalpris
Abonnementspris
- Rabat på køb af fysiske bøger
- 1 valgfrit digitalt ugeblad
- 20 timers lytning og læsning
- Adgang til 70.000+ titler
- Ingen binding
Abonnementet koster 75 kr./md.
Ingen binding og kan opsiges når som helst.
- 1 valgfrit digitalt ugeblad
- 20 timers lytning og læsning
- Adgang til 70.000+ titler
- Ingen binding
Abonnementet koster 75 kr./md.
Ingen binding og kan opsiges når som helst.
Beskrivelse af How Can Dod Compare Damage Costs Against Resilience Investment Costs for Climate-Driven Natural Hazards?
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) installations have been affected by extreme weather events, such as wind and flood damage from Hurricane Sally at Naval Air Station Pensacola and flooding from severe storms at Offutt Air Force Base. More-frequent and less-extreme events, such as recurrent flooding or hailstorms, also disrupt DoD missions and result in considerable financial loss. DoD needs a way to compare the damage costs resulting from extreme weather events against the costs of mitigating that damage through enhanced installation resilience. There is currently no DoD-validated model or method for systematically comparing climate hazard damage costs against the costs of investing in resilience options. This report begins to address this gap by assessing the relevance and limitations of this one analytic approach. Climate change is likely to increase the frequency and/or severity of extreme weather events, but it is difficult to predict with certainty which installations will be hit and when, or even by what type of hazard. It is important for DoD to account for this uncertainty by setting priorities for where and how much to invest in installation resilience to climate-driven hazards. Tools such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency's natural hazard analysis tool (Hazus) could be used to further understanding of the value of investing in installation resilience to climate-driven hazards. In 19 case studies, the annualized cost of a resilience option was compared with the averted damage over that option's lifetime under a variety of disaster scenarios to screen for potentially attractive resilience investment options.
Brugerbedømmelser af How Can Dod Compare Damage Costs Against Resilience Investment Costs for Climate-Driven Natural Hazards?
Giv din bedømmelse
For at bedømme denne bog, skal du være logget ind.Andre købte også..
Find lignende bøger
Bogen How Can Dod Compare Damage Costs Against Resilience Investment Costs for Climate-Driven Natural Hazards? findes i følgende kategorier:
- Business og læring > Videnskab
- Historie og samfund > Politik
- Hobby og fritid > Sport
- Samfund og samfundsvidenskab > Politik og regering > Politisk aktivisme > Terrorisme og væbnet kamp
- Matematik og naturvidenskab
- Geofag, geografi og miljøvidenskab > Geovidenskab > Meteorologi og klimatologi
- Idræt og udendørsaktiviteter > Idræt: generelt
- Teknologi, ingeniørvidenskab og landbrug > Miljøvidenskab, miljøteknik og miljøteknologi
© 2024 Pling BØGER Registered company number: DK43351621