Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case
- Indbinding:
- Hardback
- Sideantal:
- 324
- Udgivet:
- 5. oktober 2023
- Udgave:
- 23001
- Størrelse:
- 160x24x241 mm.
- Vægt:
- 653 g.
- 8-11 hverdage.
- 21. november 2024
På lager
Normalpris
Abonnementspris
- Rabat på køb af fysiske bøger
- 1 valgfrit digitalt ugeblad
- 20 timers lytning og læsning
- Adgang til 70.000+ titler
- Ingen binding
Abonnementet koster 75 kr./md.
Ingen binding og kan opsiges når som helst.
- 1 valgfrit digitalt ugeblad
- 20 timers lytning og læsning
- Adgang til 70.000+ titler
- Ingen binding
Abonnementet koster 75 kr./md.
Ingen binding og kan opsiges når som helst.
Beskrivelse af Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case
This book marks the 75th anniversary of the 1948 Hostage Case in which a US military tribunal in Nuremberg acquitted General Lothar Rendulic of devastating Northern Norway on account of his honest factual error. The volume critically reappraises the law and facts underlying his trial, the no second-guessing rule in customary international humanitarian law (IHL) that is named after the general himself, and the assessment of modern battlefield decisions.
Using recently discovered documents, this volume casts major doubts on Rendulic¿s claim that he considered the region¿s total devastation and the forcible evacuation of all of its inhabitants imperatively demanded by military necessity at the time. This book¿s analysis of court records reveals how the tribunal failed to examine relevant facts or explain the Rendulic Rule¿s legal origin. This anthology shows that, despite the Hostage Case¿s ambiguity and occasional suggestions to thecontrary, objective reasonableness forms part of the reasonable commander test under IHL and the mistake of fact defence under international criminal law (ICL) to which the rule has given rise. This collection also identifies modern warfare¿s characteristics¿human judgment, de-empathetic battlespace, and institutional bias¿that may make it problematic to deem some errors both honest and reasonable. The Rendulic Rule embodies an otherwise firmly established admonition against judging contentious battlefield decisions with hindsight. Nevertheless, it was born of a factually ill-suited case and continues to raise significant legal as well as ethical challenges today.
The most comprehensive study of the Rendulic Rule ever to appear in English, this multi-disciplinary anthology will appeal to researchers and practitioners of IHL and ICL, as well as military historians and military ethicists and offers ground-breaking new research.
Nobuo Hayashi is affiliated to the Centre for International and Operational Law at the Swedish Defence University in Stockholm, Sweden.
Carola Lingaas is affiliated to the Faculty of Social Studies at VID Specialized University in Oslo, Norway.
Using recently discovered documents, this volume casts major doubts on Rendulic¿s claim that he considered the region¿s total devastation and the forcible evacuation of all of its inhabitants imperatively demanded by military necessity at the time. This book¿s analysis of court records reveals how the tribunal failed to examine relevant facts or explain the Rendulic Rule¿s legal origin. This anthology shows that, despite the Hostage Case¿s ambiguity and occasional suggestions to thecontrary, objective reasonableness forms part of the reasonable commander test under IHL and the mistake of fact defence under international criminal law (ICL) to which the rule has given rise. This collection also identifies modern warfare¿s characteristics¿human judgment, de-empathetic battlespace, and institutional bias¿that may make it problematic to deem some errors both honest and reasonable. The Rendulic Rule embodies an otherwise firmly established admonition against judging contentious battlefield decisions with hindsight. Nevertheless, it was born of a factually ill-suited case and continues to raise significant legal as well as ethical challenges today.
The most comprehensive study of the Rendulic Rule ever to appear in English, this multi-disciplinary anthology will appeal to researchers and practitioners of IHL and ICL, as well as military historians and military ethicists and offers ground-breaking new research.
Nobuo Hayashi is affiliated to the Centre for International and Operational Law at the Swedish Defence University in Stockholm, Sweden.
Carola Lingaas is affiliated to the Faculty of Social Studies at VID Specialized University in Oslo, Norway.
Brugerbedømmelser af Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case
Giv din bedømmelse
For at bedømme denne bog, skal du være logget ind.Andre købte også..
Find lignende bøger
Bogen Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case findes i følgende kategorier:
© 2024 Pling BØGER Registered company number: DK43351621