Bøger af K. Schmidt

Projektarbeit aus dem Jahr 2023 im Fachbereich BWL - Unternehmensführung, Management, Organisation, Note: 1,0, ( Europäische Fernhochschule Hamburg ) (Fernuni), Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: In der vorliegenden Projektarbeit werden die Analyse der Innovationsstrategie der Audi AG sowie einer innovationsrelevanten Problemstellung behandelt. In der Analyse spielen Kurzportrait, Innovationsleitlinien und Gesamtstrategie sowie die Innovationsfelder (Nachhaltigkeit, Design, Digitalisierung, Performance) eine entscheidende Rolle. Über die innovationsrelevanten Bedarfe (Nachhaltige Mobilität und alternative Antriebe, Künstliche Intelligenz und autonomes Fahren, Digitale Services) werden verwendete Methoden im Innovationsmanagement (Audi Business Innovation GmbH, Audi Denkwerkstatt, CARIAD, Förderung von Wissenschaft, Bildung und Kooperationen) dargestellt. Anschließend findet ein potenzielles Innovationsvorhaben der Audi AG statt.

th This volume gathers together the technical papers presented at the 8 European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), held in Helsinki Finland. ECSCW is an international forum for multidisciplinary research covering the technical, empirical, and theoretical aspects of collaboration and computer systems. The 20 papers presented here have been selected via a rigorous reviewing process from 110 submissions. Both the number of submissions and the quality of the selected papers are testimony to the diversity and energy of the CSCW community. We trust that you will find the papers interesting and that they will serve to stimulate further quality work within the community. The technical papers are complemented by a wider set of activities at ECSCW 2003, including tutorials, workshops, demonstrations, videos, posters and a doctoral colloquium. Together these provide rich opportunities for discussion, learning and exploration of the more recent and novel issues in the field. This conference could not have taken place without considerable enthusiasm, support and participation, not to mention the hard work of a number of people. In particular, we would like to thank the following: * The authors, representing over 17 countries and 97 institutions, who submitted a paper. So many submissions of such high quality are the basis of a good conference. * The members of the program committee who so diligently reviewed and discussed papers. Their collective decisions result in a good scientific program and their feedback to authors strengthens the work of the community.

Schmidt and Bannon (1992) introduced the concept of common information space by contrasting it with technical conceptions of shared information: Cooperative work is not facilitated simply by the provisioning of a shared database, but rather requires the active construction by the participants of a common information space where the meanings of the shared objects are debated and resolved, at least locally and temporarily. (Schmidt and Bannon, p. 22) A CIS, then, encompasses not only the information but also the practices by which actors establish its meaning for their collective work. These negotiated understandings of the information are as important as the availability of the information itself: The actors must attempt to jointly construct a common information space which goes beyond their individual personal information spaces. . . . The common information space is negotiated and established by the actors involved. (Schmidt and Bannon, p. 28) This is not to suggest that actors' understandings of the information are identical; they are simply "e;common"e; enough to coordinate the work. People understand how the information is relevant for their own work. Therefore, individuals engaged in different activities will have different perspectives on the same information. The work of maintaining the common information space is the work that it takes to balance and accommodate these different perspectives. A "e;bug"e; report in software development is a simple example. Software developers and quality assurance personnel have access to the same bug report information. However, access to information is not sufficient to coordinate their work.