De Aller-Bedste Bøger - over 12 mio. danske og engelske bøger
Levering: 1 - 2 hverdage

Bøger af Earl M. Maltz

Filter
Filter
Sorter efterSorter Populære
  • af Earl M. Maltz
    578,95 kr.

  • - The 1972 Term and the Transformation of Constitutional Law
    af Earl M. Maltz
    673,95 kr.

  • - The Anthony Burns Case and Abolitionist Outrage
    af Earl M. Maltz
    348,95 - 785,95 kr.

    Chronicles the case of a runaway slave who was tracked to Boston by his owner. Compellingly details the struggle over his fate and how that became a focal point for national controversy. Reveals how the case became one of the most dramatic and widely publicized events in the long-running conflict over the issue of fugitive slaves.

  • af Earl M. Maltz
    348,95 - 785,95 kr.

    By presenting a picture of the pro-Southern justices on the Court, this work offers readers an understanding of how they came to their opinions, even as they failed to anticipate the impact their decision would have - a miscalculation that to some degree undermined the Court's power and authority within the American political system.

  • - Understanding the Court Dynamic
    af Earl M. Maltz
    413,95 kr.

    With seven of its justices appointed by Republican presidents, the US Supreme Court has significantly altered America's legal landscape since 1986. However, the contributors to this book show that the Rehnquist Court's conservatism is less extreme than many have supposed.

  • af Earl M. Maltz
    753,95 kr.

    During America's turbulent antebellum era, the Supreme Court decided important cases - most famously Dred Scott - that spoke to sectional concerns and shaped the nation's response to the slavery question. This title presents a comprehensive examination of the major slavery cases that came before the Court between 1825 and 1861.

  • - Originalism, Interventionism and the Politics of Judicial Review
    af Earl M. Maltz
    643,95 kr.

    This text calls for a re-evaluation of US Constitutional theory. The work re-orients the debate between originalists (those who believe that judges should be bound by the original understanding in constitutional adjudication) and non-originalists.