Bøger af Department of Defense

This Manual, "Occupational Medical Examinations and Surveillance Manual," is issued in accordance with the authority of DoD Instruction (DoDI) 6055.5 (Reference (a)). It provides health professionals with information and references appropriate for developing and conducting occupational medical examinations and surveillance prescribed in Reference (a) by identifying the known health risks associated with specific jobs, processes, and exposures. DoD 6055.5-M, "Occupational Medical Surveillance Manual," May 4, 1998, (Reference (b)) is hereby canceled. This Manual applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities in the Department of Defense ("DoD Components"). This Manual is effective immediately and is mandatory for use by all the DoD Components in developing, performing, interpreting the results of, and conducting population-based surveillance with the results of occupational medical examinations. Data collected through environmental sampling and individual surveillance should be entered into appropriate electronic data systems, as available.

This Manual is issued under the authority of DoD Directive 3150.2, "DoD Nuclear Weapon System Safety Program," December 23, 1996. It prescribes procedures for implementation of the Department of Defense Nuclear Weapon System Safety Program.

This Priorities and Allocations Manual is issued under the authority of DoD Directive 4400.1, "Defense Production Act Programs," October 12, 2001. This Manual prescribes uniform procedures to be followed by all persons delegated priorities and allocations authority, includes those persons involved with awarding or administering contracts for research, development, engineering, acquisition, production, manufacturing, or construction.

This Manual reissues Reference (a) in accordance with the authority in References (b) and (c) to provide guidance for managing Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense, and Executive Secretary of the Department of Defense correspondence, and OSD and DoD Component correspondence. This Volume provides examples and reference material for SecDef, DepSecDef, and ExecSec correspondence and OSD and DoD Component correspondent.

This Catalog is reissued under the authority of DoD Directive 4525.6, "Single Manager for Military Postal Service," May 5, 1980. Its purpose is to provide uniform procedures for administration of postal supply and equipment. The procedures prescribed in this Catalog are in accordance with the U. S. Postal Service / DoD Postal Agreement.

This Regulation is issued under the authority of DoD Instruction 5200.08, "Security of DoD Installations and Resources," December 10, 2005. It implements the policies and minimum standards for the physical security of DoD installations and resources.

This Manual is issued under the authority of DoD Instruction 4525.8. It prescribes uniform procedures and responsibilities for administering DoD official mail. This Manual updates procedures and responsibilities for DoD official mail.

This Manual is issued under the authority of DoD Instruction 4150.7, "DoD Pest Management Program," April 22, 1996. It prescribes procedures on DoD pest management training and certification of pesticide applicators.

This Manual is issued under the authority of DoD Directive 5000.59, "DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management," January 4, 1994. Its purpose is to prescribe a uniform glossary of modeling and simulation (M&S) terminology for use throughout the Department of Defense. In addition to the main glossary of terms, this Manual includes a list of M&S-related abbreviations, acronyms, and initials commonly used within the Department of Defense.

This Regulation is issued under the authority of DoD Directive 5136.1 (Reference (a)). It assigns the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (ASD(HA)) the authority, direction, and control to establish policies, procedures, and standards that shall govern DoD medical programs. Although this Regulation is based on the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, Public Law 104-191 (1996) (Reference (b)), and title 45 Code of Federal Regulations parts 160, 162, and 164 (Reference (c)), it covers much of the same ground as the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) (Reference (d)). This Regulation in no way impacts the need for the Department of Defense to comply with the FISMA. This law has not been superseded and has been taken into consideration in developing this Regulation. This Regulation applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the Department of Defense.

The purpose of this document is to provide the ways and means by which or military will advance our enduring national interests as articulated in the 2010 National Security Strategy and to accomplish the defense objectives in the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review. The Goldwater-Nichols Reorganization Act of 1986 charges the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with the responsibility of assisting the President and Secretary of Defense in providing strategic direction for the Armed Forces. In consultation with the geographic and functional Combatant Commanders and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we prepared this document to provide military advice.

This book will show you the Weapons we have in the U.S. that you probably never knew about and it will give you specs about them. It goes from space to land weapons. It show the cost for all of them and the budget for the department of defense.

This report focuses on the train and equip missions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

Information on all electrocutions that occurred in Iraq since Operation Iraqi Freedom began in March 2003.

This is a continuation of a series of Congressionally mandated, command requested, and/or self-generated reports published by the Office of Inspector General's Special Plans and Operations Directorate that focus on the train and equip missions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. General areas discussed in these reports include: Accountability of weapons transferred to the Iraqi and Afghan Security Forces, Accountability of night vision devices transferred to the Iraqi Security Forces, Effectiveness/responsiveness of the Foreign Military Sales system in support of the Iraqi and Afghan Security Forces, Logistics development of the Iraqi and Afghan Security Forces, Effectiveness of U.S. and Coalition efforts to develop the Iraqi and Afghan Security Forces, and Review of the Coalition Support Fund Program and other DoD security assistance/cooperation programs with Pakistan. On August 15, 2011, the DoDIG announced the "Assessment of U.S. Government and Coalition Efforts to Develop the Afghan Local Police," (Project No. D2011-D00SPO-0277-000). The objectives of this assessment were to determine whether: Planning and operational implementation efforts by U.S./Coalition Forces to recruit, train, advise and assist in the development of the Afghan Local Police (ALP) was effective. This included evaluating output/outcome at ALP locations at various stages of their life cycle to determine the effectiveness of U.S./Coalition involvement in developing the ALP and Ministry of Interior (MoI) capability to manage the program. Plans, training, preparation and designated missions of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)/United States Forces-Afghanistan (USFOR-A), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Training Mission-Afghanistan (NTM-A)/Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (CSTC-A), ISAF Joint Command (IJC), and Coalition Forces Special Operations Component Command-Afghanistan (CFSOCC-A) to train, advise and assist in the development of the ALP are integrated across all levels of U.S./Coalition commands/staffs, as well as between Coalition commands and the MoI/Afghan National Police (ANP).

The Armed Forces Recipe Service is a large collection of high-volume, standardized food service recipes developed by the United States Department of Defense and used by military chefs, institutional and catering operations. All of the recipes have been developed, tested and standardized for product quality, consistency and yield. The U.S. Dietary Guidelines were among the many considerations in both the selection and development of the recipes. Many of the recipes have been modified to reduce fat, salt and calories. For new and experienced cooks, consistent use of standardized recipes is essential for quality and economy. Broken into two volumes due to its size, the Armed Forces Recipe Service contains over 1,600 tested recipes calibrated to feed 100 people and easily adjusted up or down to adjust portion size depending on the number of people being fed. The recipes contain a basic nutritional analysis as well, detailing calories, carbohydrates, protein, fat, cholesterol, sodium and calcium. Both volumes of The Armed Forces Recipe Service must be purchased to have the manual in its entirety. This volume, Volume II of II, holds the following sections: Beef, Pork, Lamb, Fish and Poultry; Salads and Dressings; Sandwiches; Dressings, Gravies and Sauces; Soups; and Vegetables.

In accordance with the authority in Reference (a), this Manual implements policy, assigns responsibilities, describes procedures, identifies objectives, and provides overall guidance for the maintenance and reporting of personnel data pertaining to RC (Reserve Component) members pursuant to Reference (b). This Volume contains the standard domain values for selected data records used for the maintenance and reporting of personnel data pertaining to members of the RCs as defined and specified in Volume 1 of this Manual.

The Capstone Concept for Joint Operations describes in broad terms my vision for how the joint force circa 2016-2028 will operate in response to a wide variety of security challenges. It proposes that future joint force commanders will combine and subsequently adapt some combination of four basic categories of military activity -- combat, security, engagement, and relief and reconstruction -- in accordance with the unique requirements of each operational situation. The concept is informed by current strategic guidance, but because it looks to the future, it is intended to be adaptable, as it must be, to changes in that guidance.

The broad objective of this ongoing assessment is to determine whether the DoD programs for the care, management, and transition of recovering Service members wounded during deployment in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom were managed effectively and efficiently. Our specific objectives were to evaluate the missions, the policies, and processes of: Military units, beginning with the Army and Marine Corps, established to support the recovery of Service members and their transition to duty status (Active or Reserve Components); DOD programs for Service members affected with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or to civilian life; and We conducted this assessment in response to a request to the DoD IG made by Congressman Walter B. Jones (R-NC) in February 2009. Congressman Jones received complaints from constituents about incidents that allegedly occurred at the Wounded Warrior Battalion-East (WWBn-East) at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. As a result of a meeting with Congressman Jones and his staff, we agreed to assess Wounded Warrior matters in a systemic approach across DoD, beginning with the Army and the Marine Corps. We interviewed several of Congressman Jones' constituents both prior to and during our site visit to Camp Lejeune to obtain information about the program and the alleged concerns; however, because those constituents were no longer part of the WWBn-East at the time of our site visit, the information they provided was not directly used in support of the observations and conclusions in this report. Rather, this information was used to help frame the interview questions we used during our visit to Camp Lejeune in the fall of 2010. This is the third of multiple assessments that will be conducted at Army and Marine Corps Warrior transition units. To obtain unbiased data, not unduly reflecting the views of either the supporters or detractors of the program, we used a two-pronged approach to select our respondents. First, we determined how many Service members were required to be interviewed, then we applied a simple random sample approach to determine the Service members we should interview, as described in Appendix A. We subsequently performed interviews with Marine Corps wounded, ill, and injured personnel (hereafter referred to as Warriors), to include 64 individual interviews with Marines, and 24 additional Marines in 4 group interviews. Second, we interviewed all available members of the key groups responsible for the Warriors' care. Specifically, we conducted meetings and interviews during our 2-week visit at Camp Lejeune that included unit commanders, staff officers, and WWBn-East military staff, as well as civilian staff and contractors. A list of the meetings and interviews conducted at the Naval Hospital Camp Lejeune and WWBn-East is in Appendix A, along with the scope, methodology, and acronyms of this assessment. The prior coverage of this subject area is discussed in Appendix B. The observations and corresponding recommendations in this report focus on what we learned at Camp Lejeune, but we believe that some of our findings may have implications for other Wounded Warrior units and should be called to the attention of higher headquarters responsible for these programs.

The participating Department of Defense and Federal oversight agencies, which comprise the Southwest Asia Joint Planning Group, are pleased to present the Fiscal Year 2012 Comprehensive Oversight Plan for Southwest Asia (FY 2012 COPSWA). The FY 2012 COPSWA incorporates the planned and ongoing oversight by the Inspectors General of the Department of Defense, Department of State, and the U.S. Agency for International Development; the Special Inspectors General for Iraq Reconstruction and Afghanistan Reconstruction; the Army Audit Agency; the Naval Audit Service; and the Air Force Audit Agency. Additionally, the FY 2012 update includes the U.S. Government Accountability Office's ongoing oversight efforts related to Southwest Asia. The COPSWA includes descriptions of oversight projects that directly impact efforts in Southwest Asia and surrounding areas, as of October 1, 2011. The FY 2012 edition is organized by each oversight agency and impacted country, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Kuwait, Pakistan, Qatar, and other countries. The projects are listed in the estimated project start date order by month-year for each country grouping. The projects may be conducted exclusively in theater, require travel into theater, or be conducted outside the theater, such as solely in the continental United States (CONUS). REQUIRED OVERSIGHT: The COPSWA was first issued in June 2008 (and each year since) in accordance with the requirements of Public Law 110-181, "The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008," section 842, "Investigation of Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in Wartime Contracts and Contracting Processes in Iraq and Afghanistan," January 28, 2008. In 2009, we began to include additional oversight requirements as directed by Public Law 110-417, "The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009," section 852, "Comprehensive Audit of Spare Parts, Purchases, and Depot Overhaul and Maintenance of Equipment For Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan," October 14, 2008 (see Section 2). Additional information on Sections 842 and 852, respectively, can be found in Appendix B. EXPANSION OF THE OVERSIGHT PLAN TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL AREAS SUPPORTING THE U.S. MISSION IN SOUTHWEST ASIA: We expanded this oversight plan beyond the statutory mandate to show all of the audit, inspection, and evaluation work (oversight) for Iraq and Afghanistan and the rest of the U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility. In addition to the audits of contracts, subcontracts, and task and delivery orders for logistical support being conducted, this comprehensive plan addresses other oversight areas, including asset accountability, transition of security responsibilities to Iraq and Afghanistan, financial and logistics management, security, rule of law, and economical and social development. Our agencies continue to work together through the Southwest Asia Joint Planning Group to coordinate and provide effective oversight of the U.S.-led efforts in Southwest Asia. We also continue to coordinate oversight plans through improved communications among the members on a regular basis and on individual projects as they are proposed throughout the year.

This is the second in a series of DoD Office of Inspector General, Special Plans and Operations reports regarding establishment of an Office of Security Cooperation - Iraq (OSC-I). On August 25, 2011, the DoD Inspector General issued Report No. SPO-2011-008, "Assessment of Planning for Transitioning the Security Assistance Mission in Iraq from Department of Defense to Department of State Authority." The report determined that, despite some shortcomings, detailed planning to accomplish the transition of the security assistance function to U.S. Mission to Iraq authority was sufficiently developed and operative. This report is based on a subsequent review of efforts underway in 2011 to establish a fully functional OSC-I, to transition the security assistance mission to U.S. Mission to Iraq, and to ensure the sustained, successful operation of the security assistance mission in Iraq post-2011. On April 4, 2011, DoD Inspector General announced the "Assessment of the DoD Establishment of the Office of Security Cooperation-Iraq." Specific objectives for this assessment included determining whether: Requirements were being met to effectively execute the plan for transitioning authority, personnel, and equipment from U.S. Forces-Iraq (USF-I) to the OSC-I and Chief of Mission in Baghdad; and, Required Department of Defense support had been provided to meet "initial operating capability" (IOC) and ensure sufficiency and capacity of the OSC-I at "full operating capability" (FOC) that would accomplish its mission of supporting Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) capability development post-2011.

We initiated this project in response to a February 26, 2008, request from the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, which was based on an inquiry from Representative Jason Altmire to the Secretary of Defense concerning the death of SSG Ryan D. Maseth, U.S. Army, in Iraq. SSG Maseth was electrocuted on January 2, 2008, while showering in his quarters at the Radwaniyah Palace Complex (RPC) in Baghdad. In his letter to the Secretary of Defense dated February 19, 2008, Representative Altmire stated that Defense contracting officials were aware of electrical hazards posed by the shower facility used by SSG Maseth, but failed to direct the facility maintenance contractor to correct them. Accordingly, this office was asked to investigate "contracting matters related to the cause of this incident" (Appendix A). Based on that request and our initial review of the matter, we sought to review the relevant management, contracting, and maintenance actions prior and subsequent to the electrocution of SSG Maseth. Specifically, we reviewed: command and Government contracting management decisions concerning facility maintenance preceding the incident; procedures for facility support to the RPC; and criteria for and execution of facility inspections and maintenance. Based on our preliminary work and congressional interest, we expanded the scope of our review to include an examination of 17 other electrocutions in Iraq involving U.S. military or contractor personnel associated with Operation Iraqi Freedom since the start of operations in March 2003 (Appendix B).

In accordance with the authority of DoD Directive (DoDD) 5124.02 (Reference (a)), this Manual implements policy, assigns responsibilities, describes procedures, identifies objectives, and provides overall guidance for the maintenance and reporting of personnel data pertaining to Reserve Component (RC) members pursuant to DoD Instruction (DoDI) 7730.54 (Reference (b)). This Volume assigns responsibilities, describes procedures, identifies objectives, and provides overall guidance for the maintenance and reporting of personnel data pertaining to members of the RCs.

This Manual is composed of four volumes, each containing its own purpose. The purpose of the overall Manual, as authorized by DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01 (Reference (a)) and DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.01 (Reference (b)), is to reissue DoD 5200.1-R (Reference (c)) as a DoD Manual to implement policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for the designation, marking, protection, and dissemination of CUI and classified information, including information categorized as collateral, sensitive compartmented information (SCI), and Special Access Program. This guidance is developed in accordance with Reference (b), Executive Order (E.O.) 13526 and E.O. 13556, and part 2001 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (References (d), (e), and (f)). This combined guidance is known as the DoD Information Security Program. This Volume (Volume 3) provides guidance for safeguarding, storage, destruction, transmission, and transportation of classified information; identifies security education and training requirements and processes for handling of security violations and compromise of classified information; addresses information technology, (IT) issues of which the security manager must be aware.

This Regulation is reissued under the authority of DoD Directive 5400.11, "DoD Privacy Program," May 8, 2007 (Reference (a)). It provides guidance on section 552a of title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.), the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, (Reference (b)), and prescribes uniform procedures for implementation of the DoD Privacy Program.

Evaluation of the DoD Safety Program as it pertains to reducing preventable injuries.

This Manual is composed of four volumes, each containing its own purpose. The purpose of the overall Manual, as authorized by DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01 (Reference (a)) and DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.01 (Reference (b)), is to reissue DoD 5200.1-R (Reference (c)) as a DoD Manual to implement policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for the designation, marking, protection, and dissemination of CUI and classified information, including information categorized as collateral, sensitive compartmented information (SCI), and Special Access Program. This guidance is developed in accordance with Reference (b), Executive Order (E.O.) 13526 and E.O. 13556, and part 2001 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (References (d), (e), and (f)). This combined guidance is known as the DoD Information Security Program. This Volume (Volume 4) provides guidance for the identification and protection of CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information).

This Manual is composed of four volumes, each containing its own purpose. The purpose of the overall Manual, as authorized by DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01 (Reference (a)) and DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.01 (Reference (b)), is to reissue DoD 5200.1-R (Reference (c)) as a DoD Manual to implement policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for the designation, marking, protection, and dissemination of CUI and classified information, including information categorized as collateral, sensitive compartmented information (SCI), and Special Access Program. This guidance is developed in accordance with Reference (b), Executive Order (E.O.) 13526 and E.O. 13556, and part 2001 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (References (d), (e), and (f)). This combined guidance is known as the DoD Information Security Program. This Volume (Volume 1) describes the DoD Information Security Program; provides guidance for classification and declassification of DoD information that requires protection in the interest of the national security.

This Manual is issued in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program (NISP). It prescribes the requirements, restrictions, and other safeguards to prevent unauthorized disclosure of classified information. The Manual controls the authorized disclosure of classified information released by U.S. Government Executive Branch Departments and Agencies to their contractors. It also prescribes the procedures, requirements, restrictions, and other safeguards to protect special classes of classified information, including Restricted Data (RD), Formerly Restricted Data (FRD), intelligence sources and methods information, Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI), and Special Access Program (SAP) information. These procedures are applicable to licensees, grantees, and certificate holders to the extent legally and practically possible within the constraints of applicable law and the Code of Federal Regulations.

FLIS Management Statistics September 2009